Difference between revisions of "Chestnut Review"
(→standard tier: add higher tier) |
m (→standard tier: remove typo) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, | ||
The Editors | The Editors | ||
− | |||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Revision as of 10:29, 1 December 2021
standard tier
Dear -:
Thank you for your submission to Chestnut Review. Although we must decline your submission this time, we appreciated the chance to consider it. Please do not interpret this as a judgment of your art as a whole. Individual tastes matter a great deal in decisions like these, and though we have to decline this round, we encourage you to keep writing and creating. The world needs it, and you.
We'd also appreciate your reporting stats on Duotrope for this submission, if you use that site.
Thanks again. Best of luck with all your work. Sincerely, The Editors
higher tier
2021
Dear [first name],
Thank you for your submission to Chestnut Review. Although we must decline your submission this time, we appreciated the chance to consider it. Please do not interpret this as a judgment of your art as a whole. Individual tastes matter a great deal in decisions like these, and though we have to decline this round, we encourage you to keep writing and creating. The world needs it, and you.
Editor's note:
This piece got a lot of staff attention. We absolutely love this form--brilliant use of [technique] to explore [story topic]! [2 suggestions/questions to make story better]. This is just our opinion. If you choose to work on this piece, we'd love to read the new iteration. Please mention in the cover letter I asked for a resub. --[editor name]
We'd also appreciate your reporting stats on Duotrope for this submission, if you use that site.
Thanks again. Best of luck with all your work.
Sincerely,
The Editors