Difference between revisions of "Seneca Review"

From Rejection Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 29: Line 29:
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  
===Slightly higher tier?===
+
===Higher tier===
 
'''2019'''
 
'''2019'''
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>

Revision as of 21:06, 18 October 2020

Poetry rejections

Standard

2017 / 2020

Dear [name],

We have read your poems with care, and I’m sorry to say that we have decided against including "_______" in Seneca Review. We thank you for thinking of us and giving us a chance to read your work.

Best wishes,

David Weiss Geoffrey Babbitt Editors, Seneca Review

PS: Just a reminder that we ask that you submit work only once during our annual reading period.

Prose rejections

Standard

2013

Dear [name],

We have read your submission to our [theme] issue with care, and we’re sorry to say that we’ve decided against including "_______" in this Seneca Review special issue. We thank you for thinking of us and for giving us a chance to read your work.

Sincerely,

The Editors

Higher tier

2019

Dear ________,

I am sorry to say we have decided against including "Title" in Seneca Review. Thank you for thinking of us and giving us a chance to read your work.

We welcome your future submissions during our next reading period.

Best wishes,

John D’Agata Essay Editor, Seneca Review