Difference between revisions of "Hobart"
D. A. Hosek (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Prose Rejections== | == Prose Rejections== | ||
| − | + | ===Sub-Standard?=== | |
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| − | + | ===Standard=== | |
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| + | ===Higher Tier=== | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Thank you very much for submitting but I don't think we're the right match for this one, though there is some strong writing here and I hope we will get to read more. | Thank you very much for submitting but I don't think we're the right match for this one, though there is some strong writing here and I hope we will get to read more. | ||
Revision as of 06:58, 25 July 2011
Prose Rejections
Sub-Standard?
Thank you for sending us “[title]”. We appreciate the chance to read it. Unfortunately, the piece is not for us.
Thanks again. Best of luck with this.
Sincerely,
Hobart
Standard
Thank you very much for submitting but I don't think we're the right match for this. Please know we read and appreciate every submission and it pains us a little to be resorting to such a standard reply, but submissions keep coming in and the hours keep slipping away and what is one to do. Best of luck!
Thank you again,
HOBART
Higher Tier
Thank you very much for submitting but I don't think we're the right match for this one, though there is some strong writing here and I hope we will get to read more.
Please know we read and appreciate every submission and it pains us a little to be resorting to such a standard reply, but submissions keep coming in and the hours keep slipping away and what is one to do. Best of luck!
Thank you again,
HOBART
