Difference between revisions of "Apex"
From Rejection Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (Adding latest rejection letter) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
=== Standard === | === Standard === | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
'''2013''' | '''2013''' | ||
<blockquote>Dear ***, | <blockquote>Dear ***, | ||
Revision as of 04:50, 16 April 2018
Prose Rejections
Standard
2013
Dear ***,
Thank you for submitting "***" to Apex Magazine for consideration. Unfortunately, it does not meet our needs at this time.
Sincerely, Jei D. Marcade
Submissions Editor, Apex Magazine
2011
We regret to inform you that your story "TITLE" does not currently meet our needs. We're going to pass.
Apex wishes you future writing successes, and to try us again soon.
Sincerely,
The Apex Team
Higher Tier
2013
Dear ***,
Thank you for submitting "***" to Apex Magazine for consideration. Unfortunately, I'm going to pass on it. It's just not what I'm looking for right now.
I look forward to reading further submissions from you.
Warmly,
Lynne
-- Lynne M. Thomas Editor-in-Chief Apex Magazine
2012 Hugo Award Nominee for Best Semiprozine
