Difference between revisions of "Gettysburg Review"
From Rejection Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=== Standard === | === Standard === | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| − | Thank you for letting us consider | + | Dear ------, |
| + | |||
| + | Thank you for letting us consider "------." We regret that it does not suit present needs. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Best of luck with it and your other work. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sincerely, | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Gettysburg Review | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Revision as of 12:42, 10 April 2018
Contents
Prose rejections
Standard
Thank you for letting us consider your manuscript. We regret that it does not suit our present needs.
Higher Tier
"Story" contains much good, strong writing, but there's not enough of a narrative arc for it to work as a short story. Best of luck with the novel. Sincerely, XXX.
Poetry rejections
Standard
Dear ------,
Thank you for letting us consider "------." We regret that it does not suit present needs.
Best of luck with it and your other work.
Sincerely,
The Gettysburg Review
Higher Tier
Text of Higher Tier Rejection
