Difference between revisions of "Washington Square Review"
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
=== Standard === | === Standard === | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''2011''' | ||
| + | |||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| − | + | Dear [Author], | |
| + | |||
| + | Thank you for sending us your poems. We appreciated the opportunity to read your work; however, your submission was not right for our upcoming issue. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Best of luck in securing publication for your work! | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks again, | ||
| + | |||
| + | [---] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Poetry Editors, Washington Square | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
| − | |||
=== Higher Tier === | === Higher Tier === | ||
Revision as of 01:55, 21 December 2011
Contents
Prose rejections
Standard
Thank you for sending us ["title"]. We appreciate the chance to read it. Unfortunately, the piece is not for us.
Higher Tier
Thank you for submitting your work to Washington Square. We appreciate the efforts that have gone into this piece.
Unfortunately, given the volume of submissions we receive, even quality work often has to be declined. Please be assured that your piece was read thoroughly and given careful consideration by our editorial staff.
Sincerely, The Editors of Washington Square
Poetry rejections
Standard
2011
Dear [Author],
Thank you for sending us your poems. We appreciated the opportunity to read your work; however, your submission was not right for our upcoming issue.
Best of luck in securing publication for your work!
Thanks again,
[---]
Poetry Editors, Washington Square
Higher Tier
Text of Higher Tier Rejection
