Difference between revisions of "Gettysburg Review"
From Rejection Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 9: | Line 9: | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
− | "Story" contains much good, strong writing, but there's not enough of a narrative arc for it to work as a short story. Best of luck with the novel. Sincerely, | + | "Story" contains much good, strong writing, but there's not enough of a narrative arc for it to work as a short story. Best of luck with the novel. Sincerely, XXX. |
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Revision as of 16:48, 17 February 2015
Contents
Prose rejections
Standard
Thank you for letting us consider your manuscript. We regret that it does not suit our present needs.
Higher Tier
"Story" contains much good, strong writing, but there's not enough of a narrative arc for it to work as a short story. Best of luck with the novel. Sincerely, XXX.
Poetry rejections
Standard
Thank you for letting us consider your manuscript. We regret that it does not suit our present needs.
Higher Tier
Text of Higher Tier Rejection