Difference between revisions of "User talk:D. A. Hosek"

From Rejection Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 18: Line 18:
 
NP. With some mags, it's easily done.
 
NP. With some mags, it's easily done.
 
BTW, I've been a lurker on here for maybe a year, but just signed up as an editor today, so if you see any mistakes I might make, feel free to correct, assist, etc, thanks.
 
BTW, I've been a lurker on here for maybe a year, but just signed up as an editor today, so if you see any mistakes I might make, feel free to correct, assist, etc, thanks.
 +
 +
== Columbia Review/not spam ==
 +
 +
Hi, D.A. Thank you so much for your unfailing work on this site. I know how difficult spam management has been because I've seen so much of it listed on the recent changes page. FYI the filter stopped me from creating a new entry for [Columbia Review] today (note this is different from the [Columbia Journal] entry we were discussing earlier). It thought I was spam twice and gave me a catchpa question each time, which I hope I answered correctly (to be or not ___, etc - maybe it's case sensitive). Finally it told me the review's web domain, which was included in their rejection, was triggering the problem (l i n k t r . e e /thecolumbiareview - spaced so I won't face spam problems here). My guess is this domain is probably one where a lot of spam comes from and it's blacklisted, but just an FYI. I was able to remove the web address from the reject and push the entry through.
 +
 +
Thanks again,
 +
Kentuckian

Revision as of 08:49, 21 December 2021

Notices of spam

Let me know below if you spot spam postings on the site so I can block the posters and delete pages if necessary.


I found some spam on Obtain New Car loans http://www.rejectionwiki.com/index.php?title=Obtain_Car_Loans_For_Bad_Credit_advice_45 Is this how I should let you know?

Yep, thanks. D. A. Hosek 20:14, 14 August 2011 (PDT)

Found some on Automatic pad submission --DA (talk) 02:12, 20 September 2014 (PDT)


>>Thanks for the heads up on this.

Thanks for the thanks

NP. With some mags, it's easily done. BTW, I've been a lurker on here for maybe a year, but just signed up as an editor today, so if you see any mistakes I might make, feel free to correct, assist, etc, thanks.

Columbia Review/not spam

Hi, D.A. Thank you so much for your unfailing work on this site. I know how difficult spam management has been because I've seen so much of it listed on the recent changes page. FYI the filter stopped me from creating a new entry for [Columbia Review] today (note this is different from the [Columbia Journal] entry we were discussing earlier). It thought I was spam twice and gave me a catchpa question each time, which I hope I answered correctly (to be or not ___, etc - maybe it's case sensitive). Finally it told me the review's web domain, which was included in their rejection, was triggering the problem (l i n k t r . e e /thecolumbiareview - spaced so I won't face spam problems here). My guess is this domain is probably one where a lot of spam comes from and it's blacklisted, but just an FYI. I was able to remove the web address from the reject and push the entry through.

Thanks again, Kentuckian