Difference between revisions of "User talk:D. A. Hosek"
(→Columbia Review/not spam: new section) |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
NP. With some mags, it's easily done. | NP. With some mags, it's easily done. | ||
BTW, I've been a lurker on here for maybe a year, but just signed up as an editor today, so if you see any mistakes I might make, feel free to correct, assist, etc, thanks. | BTW, I've been a lurker on here for maybe a year, but just signed up as an editor today, so if you see any mistakes I might make, feel free to correct, assist, etc, thanks. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Columbia Review/not spam == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Hi, D.A. Thank you so much for your unfailing work on this site. I know how difficult spam management has been because I've seen so much of it listed on the recent changes page. FYI the filter stopped me from creating a new entry for [Columbia Review] today (note this is different from the [Columbia Journal] entry we were discussing earlier). It thought I was spam twice and gave me a catchpa question each time, which I hope I answered correctly (to be or not ___, etc - maybe it's case sensitive). Finally it told me the review's web domain, which was included in their rejection, was triggering the problem (l i n k t r . e e /thecolumbiareview - spaced so I won't face spam problems here). My guess is this domain is probably one where a lot of spam comes from and it's blacklisted, but just an FYI. I was able to remove the web address from the reject and push the entry through. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thanks again, | ||
+ | Kentuckian |
Revision as of 08:49, 21 December 2021
Notices of spam
Let me know below if you spot spam postings on the site so I can block the posters and delete pages if necessary.
I found some spam on Obtain New Car loans
http://www.rejectionwiki.com/index.php?title=Obtain_Car_Loans_For_Bad_Credit_advice_45
Is this how I should let you know?
- Yep, thanks. D. A. Hosek 20:14, 14 August 2011 (PDT)
Found some on Automatic pad submission --DA (talk) 02:12, 20 September 2014 (PDT)
>>Thanks for the heads up on this.
Thanks for the thanks
NP. With some mags, it's easily done. BTW, I've been a lurker on here for maybe a year, but just signed up as an editor today, so if you see any mistakes I might make, feel free to correct, assist, etc, thanks.
Columbia Review/not spam
Hi, D.A. Thank you so much for your unfailing work on this site. I know how difficult spam management has been because I've seen so much of it listed on the recent changes page. FYI the filter stopped me from creating a new entry for [Columbia Review] today (note this is different from the [Columbia Journal] entry we were discussing earlier). It thought I was spam twice and gave me a catchpa question each time, which I hope I answered correctly (to be or not ___, etc - maybe it's case sensitive). Finally it told me the review's web domain, which was included in their rejection, was triggering the problem (l i n k t r . e e /thecolumbiareview - spaced so I won't face spam problems here). My guess is this domain is probably one where a lot of spam comes from and it's blacklisted, but just an FYI. I was able to remove the web address from the reject and push the entry through.
Thanks again, Kentuckian