Difference between revisions of "Los Angeles Review"

From Rejection Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 17: Line 17:
 
Poetry Editors
 
Poetry Editors
 
The Los Angeles Review
 
The Los Angeles Review
 +
</blockquote>
 +
 +
OR
 +
 +
<blockquote>
 +
Standard rejection with handwritten note from editor
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  

Revision as of 08:12, 24 March 2012

Standard

Thank you for submitting to The Los Angeles Review. While we have read your work with interest, it does not meet our editorial needs at this time. We appreciate your efforts, and wish you all the best in placing this work elsewhere.

We will reopen to submissions August 1.

Higher Tier

Thank you for submitting to The Los Angeles Review. While we have read your work with interest, it does not meet our editorial needs at this time. We appreciate your efforts, and wish you all the best in placing this work elsewhere.

While this group of work wasn't ultimately a fit for us, we did enjoy your voice and found your work engaging. We hope you will try us again in the future.

We will reopen to work on August 1.

All the best, Poetry Editors The Los Angeles Review

OR

Standard rejection with handwritten note from editor

Higher Tier

Thank you for submitting [title] to The Los Angeles Review.

While [title] wasn't right for us at this time, we enjoyed reading your work, and we would be happy to see more from you in the future. We wish you all the best in placing this piece elsewhere. Please try us again in during our next open submission period in 2012.

Sincerely,

Stefanie Freele Fiction Editor The Los Angeles Review