Difference between revisions of "Antioch Review"

From Rejection Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(UIhwRNYdLhZAdvJxedH)
 
(added what appears to be higher tier prose rejection)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This makes everything so completely paeinsls.
+
==Prose Rejections==
 +
 
 +
===Standard===
 +
 
 +
<blockquote>
 +
Thank you for sending us your manuscript. The return of your work does not necessarily imply criticism of its merit, but may simply mean that it does not meet our present editorial needs.  We regret that circumstances do not allow individual comment.
 +
 
 +
The Editors
 +
</blockquote>
 +
 
 +
===Higher Tier===
 +
 
 +
<blockquote>
 +
Thank you for sending us your manuscript.  The return of your work does not necessarily imply criticism of its merit, but may simply mean that it does not meet our present editorial needs.  We regret that circumstances do not allow individual comment.
 +
 
 +
We do encourage you to submit more of your work for consideration in ''Antioch Review''. In the meantime, we wish you much success in your writing endeavors.
 +
 
 +
The Editors
 +
</blockquote>

Latest revision as of 04:37, 19 March 2017

Prose Rejections

Standard

Thank you for sending us your manuscript. The return of your work does not necessarily imply criticism of its merit, but may simply mean that it does not meet our present editorial needs. We regret that circumstances do not allow individual comment.

The Editors

Higher Tier

Thank you for sending us your manuscript. The return of your work does not necessarily imply criticism of its merit, but may simply mean that it does not meet our present editorial needs. We regret that circumstances do not allow individual comment.

We do encourage you to submit more of your work for consideration in Antioch Review. In the meantime, we wish you much success in your writing endeavors.

The Editors