Difference between revisions of "Iowa Review"
From Rejection Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (mZygNFYRMYaM) |
Remybarnes (talk | contribs) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | ===Standard=== | |
| + | |||
| + | <blockquote> | ||
| + | Dear Writer, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thank you for allowing us to consider your work. Thought we find we are unable to use it, we consider it a privilege that you thought of us and regret that the volume of submissions precludes a more personal reply. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sincerely, | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Editors | ||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Higher Tier=== | ||
| + | 2018 | ||
| + | |||
| + | <blockquote> | ||
| + | Dear [writer's name] , | ||
| + | Thank you for allowing us to consider this submission. Though we find we are unable to use it, we gave serious consideration to your submission and found it very promising. We wish you the best in placing this work and hope to see more from you in the future. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sincerely, | ||
| + | The Editors | ||
| + | Iowa Review | ||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
Latest revision as of 22:09, 26 February 2018
Standard
Dear Writer,
Thank you for allowing us to consider your work. Thought we find we are unable to use it, we consider it a privilege that you thought of us and regret that the volume of submissions precludes a more personal reply.
Sincerely,
The Editors
Higher Tier
2018
Dear [writer's name] , Thank you for allowing us to consider this submission. Though we find we are unable to use it, we gave serious consideration to your submission and found it very promising. We wish you the best in placing this work and hope to see more from you in the future.
Sincerely, The Editors Iowa Review
