Difference between revisions of "Seneca Review"

From Rejection Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Poetry rejections==
 +
===Standard===
 +
'''2017'''
 +
<blockquote>
 +
Dear [name],
 +
 +
We have read your poems with care, and I’m sorry to say that we have decided against including "_______" in Seneca Review. We thank you for thinking of us and giving us a chance to read your work.
 +
 +
Best wishes,
 +
 +
David Weiss
 +
Geoffrey Babbitt
 +
Editors, Seneca Review
 +
 +
PS: Just a reminder that we ask that you submit work only once during our annual reading period.
 +
</blockquote>
 +
 
==Prose rejections==
 
==Prose rejections==
===Standard?===
+
===Standard===
 
'''2013'''
 
'''2013'''
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
Dear Writer,  
+
Dear [name],  
  
 
We have read your submission to our [theme] issue with care, and we’re sorry to say that we’ve decided against including "_______" in this Seneca Review special issue. We thank you for thinking of us and for giving us a chance to read your work.  
 
We have read your submission to our [theme] issue with care, and we’re sorry to say that we’ve decided against including "_______" in this Seneca Review special issue. We thank you for thinking of us and for giving us a chance to read your work.  
Line 10: Line 27:
  
 
The Editors
 
The Editors
 +
</blockquote>
 +
 +
===Higher tier===
 +
'''2019'''
 +
<blockquote>
 +
Dear ________,
 +
 +
I am sorry to say we have decided against including "Title" in Seneca Review. Thank you for thinking of us and giving us a chance to read your work.
 +
 +
We welcome your future submissions during our next reading period.
 +
 +
Best wishes,
 +
 +
John D’Agata
 +
Essay Editor, Seneca Review
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>

Latest revision as of 21:08, 18 October 2020

Poetry rejections

Standard

2017

Dear [name],

We have read your poems with care, and I’m sorry to say that we have decided against including "_______" in Seneca Review. We thank you for thinking of us and giving us a chance to read your work.

Best wishes,

David Weiss Geoffrey Babbitt Editors, Seneca Review

PS: Just a reminder that we ask that you submit work only once during our annual reading period.

Prose rejections

Standard

2013

Dear [name],

We have read your submission to our [theme] issue with care, and we’re sorry to say that we’ve decided against including "_______" in this Seneca Review special issue. We thank you for thinking of us and for giving us a chance to read your work.

Sincerely,

The Editors

Higher tier

2019

Dear ________,

I am sorry to say we have decided against including "Title" in Seneca Review. Thank you for thinking of us and giving us a chance to read your work.

We welcome your future submissions during our next reading period.

Best wishes,

John D’Agata Essay Editor, Seneca Review