Difference between revisions of "Virginia Quarterly Review"
Cavishniac (talk | contribs) |
m (→Standard: add year) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
=== Standard === | === Standard === | ||
| − | |||
| + | '''2020 & 2022''' | ||
| + | <blockquote> | ||
| + | Dear First Last, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thank you for sending us "A Story Title," and for being so patient in waiting for a response. Unfortunately, it doesn't fit our needs at this time. We wish you the best of luck in placing it elsewhere. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sincerely, | ||
| + | The Editors | ||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Year?''' | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
Dear ——, | Dear ——, | ||
| Line 16: | Line 26: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
| − | |||
=== Higher Tier === | === Higher Tier === | ||
| Line 33: | Line 42: | ||
=== Standard === | === Standard === | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| − | + | Dear —, | |
| + | |||
| + | Thank you for sending us "—," and for being so patient in waiting for a response. Unfortunately, it doesn't fit our needs at this time. We wish you the best of luck in placing it elsewhere. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sincerely, | ||
| + | The Editors | ||
| + | Virginia Quarterly Review | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
| Line 41: | Line 56: | ||
Text of Higher Tier Rejection | Text of Higher Tier Rejection | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 12:42, 24 February 2022
Contents
Prose rejections
Standard
2020 & 2022
Dear First Last,
Thank you for sending us "A Story Title," and for being so patient in waiting for a response. Unfortunately, it doesn't fit our needs at this time. We wish you the best of luck in placing it elsewhere.
Sincerely, The Editors
Year?
Dear ——,
Thank you for sending us "——". We appreciate the chance to read it. Unfortunately, the piece is not for us.
Thanks again. Best of luck with this.
Sincerely,
W. Ralph Eubanks
Higher Tier
Dear ---,
Thanks for your recent submission to VQR: "___." While the piece had obvious merit it just doesn't fit our needs at present. We wish we could offer a more personal response to your submission, but the number of manuscripts we receive makes this impossible. Please know, however, that we've read your work and appreciate your interest in our journal. Please do keep us in mind in the future.
Best regards, The Editors
Poetry rejections
Standard
Dear —,
Thank you for sending us "—," and for being so patient in waiting for a response. Unfortunately, it doesn't fit our needs at this time. We wish you the best of luck in placing it elsewhere.
Sincerely, The Editors Virginia Quarterly Review
Higher Tier
Text of Higher Tier Rejection
