Difference between revisions of "Seneca Review"
m (→Standard) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Poetry rejections== | ==Poetry rejections== | ||
===Standard=== | ===Standard=== | ||
| − | '''2017 | + | '''2017''' |
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
Dear [name], | Dear [name], | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
| − | === | + | ===Higher tier=== |
'''2019''' | '''2019''' | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:08, 18 October 2020
Poetry rejections
Standard
2017
Dear [name],
We have read your poems with care, and I’m sorry to say that we have decided against including "_______" in Seneca Review. We thank you for thinking of us and giving us a chance to read your work.
Best wishes,
David Weiss Geoffrey Babbitt Editors, Seneca Review
PS: Just a reminder that we ask that you submit work only once during our annual reading period.
Prose rejections
Standard
2013
Dear [name],
We have read your submission to our [theme] issue with care, and we’re sorry to say that we’ve decided against including "_______" in this Seneca Review special issue. We thank you for thinking of us and for giving us a chance to read your work.
Sincerely,
The Editors
Higher tier
2019
Dear ________,
I am sorry to say we have decided against including "Title" in Seneca Review. Thank you for thinking of us and giving us a chance to read your work.
We welcome your future submissions during our next reading period.
Best wishes,
John D’Agata Essay Editor, Seneca Review
