Difference between revisions of "Virginia Quarterly Review"

From Rejection Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Prose rejections ==
 
== Prose rejections ==
 +
 +
== Tiered ===
 +
 +
"2014"
 +
 +
<blockquote>
 +
Dear ---,
 +
 +
Thanks for your recent submission to VQR: "___." While the piece had obvious merit it just doesn't fit our needs at present. We wish we could offer a more personal response to your submission, but the number of manuscripts we receive makes this impossible. Please know, however, that we've read your work and appreciate your interest in our journal. Please do keep us in mind in the future.
 +
 +
Best regards,
 +
The Editors
 +
</blockquote>
 +
  
 
=== Standard ===
 
=== Standard ===

Revision as of 10:18, 4 October 2014

Prose rejections

Tiered =

"2014"

Dear ---,

Thanks for your recent submission to VQR: "___." While the piece had obvious merit it just doesn't fit our needs at present. We wish we could offer a more personal response to your submission, but the number of manuscripts we receive makes this impossible. Please know, however, that we've read your work and appreciate your interest in our journal. Please do keep us in mind in the future.

Best regards, The Editors


Standard

2013

Dear ——,

Thank you for sending us "——". We appreciate the chance to read it. Unfortunately, the piece is not for us.

Thanks again. Best of luck with this.

Sincerely,

W. Ralph Eubanks

2011

Dear ——,

Thanks for your recent submission to VQR: "——." We regret that it's not right for our current needs. We wish we could respond more personally to your submission, but the number of manuscripts we receive makes this impossible. Please know, however, that we've read your work and appreciate your interest in our journal. We wish you the best in placing your writing elsewhere.

Best regards,

The Editors