Difference between revisions of "The Lascaux Review"
D. A. Hosek (talk | contribs) |
m (→Tiered) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=== Standard === | === Standard === | ||
| + | '''2018''' | ||
| + | <blockquote>Dear —, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Unfortunately, we don't feel it's right for our journal. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please keep in mind that opinions about writing are highly subjective, and just because a piece isn't right for us doesn’t mean it won’t be perfect for someone else. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We appreciate you thinking of us and wish you success placing your work elsewhere. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sincerely, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Editorial Staff | ||
| + | The Lascaux Review | ||
| + | |||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''2017''' | ||
<blockquote>Dear —, | <blockquote>Dear —, | ||
| Line 15: | Line 32: | ||
Editorial Staff | Editorial Staff | ||
The Lascaux Review | The Lascaux Review | ||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Tiered === | ||
| + | |||
| + | <blockquote>Dear —, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Unfortunately, we don't feel it's a good fit for our journal. | ||
| + | Please keep in mind that opinions about writing are highly subjective, and just because a piece isn't right for us doesn’t mean it won’t be perfect for someone else. We'll be happy to consider any new work you care to submit in the future. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sincerely, | ||
| + | Editorial Staff | ||
| + | The Lascaux Review | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
| Line 23: | Line 52: | ||
=== Standard === | === Standard === | ||
| − | <blockquote> | + | '''2018''' |
| − | Dear —, | + | <blockquote>Dear —, |
| + | |||
| + | Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Unfortunately, we don't feel it's right for our journal. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please keep in mind that opinions about writing are highly subjective, and just because a piece isn't right for us doesn’t mean it won’t be perfect for someone else. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We appreciate you thinking of us and wish you success placing your work elsewhere. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sincerely, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Editorial Staff | ||
| + | The Lascaux Review | ||
| + | |||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''2017''' | ||
| + | <blockquote>Dear —, | ||
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Unfortunately, your submission doesn’t meet our needs at this time. | Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Unfortunately, your submission doesn’t meet our needs at this time. | ||
| Line 36: | Line 81: | ||
Editorial Staff | Editorial Staff | ||
The Lascaux Review | The Lascaux Review | ||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Tiered=== | ||
| + | '''2024''' | ||
| + | <blockquote>Dear —, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Unfortunately, we don't feel it's a good fit for our journal. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please keep in mind that opinions about writing are highly subjective, and just because a piece isn't right for us doesn’t mean it won’t be perfect for someone else. We'll be happy to consider any new work you care to submit in the future. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sincerely, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Editorial Staff | ||
| + | The Lascaux Review | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Latest revision as of 08:28, 5 November 2024
Poetry rejections
Standard
2018
Dear —,
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Unfortunately, we don't feel it's right for our journal.
Please keep in mind that opinions about writing are highly subjective, and just because a piece isn't right for us doesn’t mean it won’t be perfect for someone else.
We appreciate you thinking of us and wish you success placing your work elsewhere.
Sincerely,
Editorial Staff The Lascaux Review
2017
Dear —,
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Unfortunately, your submission doesn’t meet our needs at this time.
Please keep in mind that opinions about writing are highly subjective, and just because a piece isn't right for us doesn’t mean it won’t be perfect for someone else.
We appreciate you thinking of us and wish you success placing your work elsewhere.
Sincerely,
Editorial Staff The Lascaux Review
Tiered
Dear —,
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Unfortunately, we don't feel it's a good fit for our journal.
Please keep in mind that opinions about writing are highly subjective, and just because a piece isn't right for us doesn’t mean it won’t be perfect for someone else. We'll be happy to consider any new work you care to submit in the future.
Sincerely,
Editorial Staff The Lascaux Review
Fiction Rejections
Standard
2018
Dear —,
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Unfortunately, we don't feel it's right for our journal.
Please keep in mind that opinions about writing are highly subjective, and just because a piece isn't right for us doesn’t mean it won’t be perfect for someone else.
We appreciate you thinking of us and wish you success placing your work elsewhere.
Sincerely,
Editorial Staff The Lascaux Review
2017
Dear —,
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Unfortunately, your submission doesn’t meet our needs at this time.
Please keep in mind that opinions about writing are highly subjective, and just because a piece isn't right for us doesn’t mean it won’t be perfect for someone else.
We appreciate you thinking of us and wish you success placing your work elsewhere.
Sincerely,
Editorial Staff The Lascaux Review
Tiered
2024
Dear —,
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Unfortunately, we don't feel it's a good fit for our journal.
Please keep in mind that opinions about writing are highly subjective, and just because a piece isn't right for us doesn’t mean it won’t be perfect for someone else. We'll be happy to consider any new work you care to submit in the future.
Sincerely,
Editorial Staff The Lascaux Review
