Difference between revisions of "Threepenny Review"

From Rejection Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with ""The Threepenny Review is an American literary magazine founded in 1980. It is published in Berkeley, California by founding editor Wendy Lesser. Maintaining a quarterly schedule...")
 
m (→‎Standard: bold tag)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
== Prose Rejections ==
 
== Prose Rejections ==
  
<p>
+
=== Standard ===
'''Standard'''
+
<blockquote>
<p>
 
 
We have considered your submission carefully, and unfortunately we are not able to use it in The Threepenny Review.  Please do not take this as a comment on the quality of your writing; we receive so many submissions that we are able to accept only a small fraction of them.
 
We have considered your submission carefully, and unfortunately we are not able to use it in The Threepenny Review.  Please do not take this as a comment on the quality of your writing; we receive so many submissions that we are able to accept only a small fraction of them.
<p>
+
 
Thank you for sending your work to us, and please accept our apologies for the automated message system. We wish we had time to reply to everyone individually.
 
Thank you for sending your work to us, and please accept our apologies for the automated message system. We wish we had time to reply to everyone individually.
<p>
+
 
Editors
 
Editors
 +
</blockquote>
 +
 +
'''2018'''
 +
<blockquote>
 +
We have read your submission, and unfortunately we are not able to use it in The Threepenny Review.  Please do not take this as a comment on the quality of your writing; we receive so many submissions that we are able to accept only a small fraction of them.
 +
 +
Thank you for sending your work to us, and please accept our apologies for the automated message system. We wish we had time to reply to everyone individually.
 +
</blockquote>
 +
 +
== Poetry Rejections ==
 +
 +
=== Standard ===
 +
<blockquote>
 +
We have read your submission, and unfortunately we are not able to use it in The Threepenny Review.  Please do not take this as a comment on the quality of your writing; we receive so many submissions that we are able to accept only a small fraction of them.
 +
 +
Thank you for sending your work to us, and please accept our apologies for the automated message system. We wish we had time to reply to everyone individually.
 +
 +
The Editors
 +
</blockquote>

Latest revision as of 06:06, 28 January 2022

"The Threepenny Review is an American literary magazine founded in 1980. It is published in Berkeley, California by founding editor Wendy Lesser. Maintaining a quarterly schedule (March, June, September, December), it offers fiction, memoirs, poetry, essays and criticism to a readership of 10,000. Without the support of patrons or a university, the publication has an annual budget of $200,000."


Prose Rejections

Standard

We have considered your submission carefully, and unfortunately we are not able to use it in The Threepenny Review. Please do not take this as a comment on the quality of your writing; we receive so many submissions that we are able to accept only a small fraction of them.

Thank you for sending your work to us, and please accept our apologies for the automated message system. We wish we had time to reply to everyone individually.

Editors

2018

We have read your submission, and unfortunately we are not able to use it in The Threepenny Review. Please do not take this as a comment on the quality of your writing; we receive so many submissions that we are able to accept only a small fraction of them.

Thank you for sending your work to us, and please accept our apologies for the automated message system. We wish we had time to reply to everyone individually.

Poetry Rejections

Standard

We have read your submission, and unfortunately we are not able to use it in The Threepenny Review. Please do not take this as a comment on the quality of your writing; we receive so many submissions that we are able to accept only a small fraction of them.

Thank you for sending your work to us, and please accept our apologies for the automated message system. We wish we had time to reply to everyone individually.

The Editors