Difference between revisions of "Seneca Review"

From Rejection Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 29: Line 29:
  
 
The Editors
 
The Editors
 +
</blockquote>
 +
 +
===Slightly higher tier?===
 +
'''2019'''
 +
<blockquote>
 +
Dear ________,
 +
 +
I am sorry to say we have decided against including "Title" in Seneca Review. Thank you for thinking of us and giving us a chance to read your work.
 +
 +
We welcome your future submissions during our next reading period.
 +
 +
Best wishes,
 +
 +
John D’Agata
 +
Essay Editor, Seneca Review
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>

Revision as of 23:11, 24 October 2019

Poetry rejections

Standard

2017

Dear [name],

We have read your poems with care, and I’m sorry to say that we have decided against including "_______" in Seneca Review. We thank you for thinking of us and giving us a chance to read your work.

Best wishes,

David Weiss Geoffrey Babbitt Editors, Seneca Review

PS: Just a reminder that we ask that you submit work only once during our annual reading period.


Prose rejections

Standard

2013

Dear [name],

We have read your submission to our [theme] issue with care, and we’re sorry to say that we’ve decided against including "_______" in this Seneca Review special issue. We thank you for thinking of us and for giving us a chance to read your work.

Sincerely,

The Editors

Slightly higher tier?

2019

Dear ________,

I am sorry to say we have decided against including "Title" in Seneca Review. Thank you for thinking of us and giving us a chance to read your work.

We welcome your future submissions during our next reading period.

Best wishes,

John D’Agata Essay Editor, Seneca Review