Difference between revisions of "Cimarron Review"
D. A. Hosek (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| − | == Higher Tier == | + | === Higher Tier === |
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
Our editors considered your work, but finally decided not to accept it for publication. Sorry we don't have better news this time; thanks, in any case, for your interest in the Cimarron Review. | Our editors considered your work, but finally decided not to accept it for publication. Sorry we don't have better news this time; thanks, in any case, for your interest in the Cimarron Review. | ||
Associate Editor | Associate Editor | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Revision as of 08:22, 9 August 2019
"We are interested in any strong writing of a literary variety, but are especially partial to fiction in the modern realist tradition and poetry that engages the reader through a distinctive voice—be it lyric, narrative, etc."
Contents
Prose Rejections
Standard
Dear [Name]:
Our editors read your submission, but decided not to accept it for publication. We wish you luck placing your manuscript elsewhere, and thank you for your interest in Cimarron Review.
Sincerely, The Editors
Poetry Rejections
Standard
Our editors have carefully read your submission but feel it does not suit the journal's needs at this time. We wish you luck placing your manuscript elsewhere, and thank you for thinking of the Cimarron Review.
All Best, Associate Editors
Possible Higher Tier
Our editors read your work with interest, but finally decided not to accept it for publication.
We hope that you will continue to send us your work.
Sincerely, The Editors of Cimarron Review
Higher Tier
Our editors considered your work, but finally decided not to accept it for publication. Sorry we don't have better news this time; thanks, in any case, for your interest in the Cimarron Review. Associate Editor
