Difference between revisions of "The Emerson Review"
From Rejection Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===Standard=== | ===Standard=== | ||
| − | <blockquote>We appreciated the chance to read | + | <blockquote> |
| + | Dear [Name], | ||
| + | |||
| + | We appreciated the chance to read [X]. Unfortunately, we do not feel the piece is a good fit for us right now. We wish you luck with it elsewhere, and hope that you consider submitting more work with us in the future. | ||
Thanks, | Thanks, | ||
| − | + | The Emerson Review </blockquote> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
===Higher Tier=== | ===Higher Tier=== | ||
Latest revision as of 14:22, 15 March 2018
Standard
Dear [Name],
We appreciated the chance to read [X]. Unfortunately, we do not feel the piece is a good fit for us right now. We wish you luck with it elsewhere, and hope that you consider submitting more work with us in the future.
Thanks,
The Emerson Review
Higher Tier
We appreciated the chance to read "X", "Y", and "Z."
[Insert personalized assessment of work with critique]
Unfortunately, the piece is not a good fit for us, but we wish you luck with it elsewhere.
Thank you for your submission,
Rachel Amico The Emerson Review
